Wednesday, June 20, 2007

ALL LIVERPOOL INFORMATION WILL NOW BE MOVED

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

ALL LIVERPOOL INFORMATION WILL NOW BE MOVED



TRYING TO KEEP UP WITH ALL MY BLOGS IS BECOMING TOO MUCH , THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN EACH OF MY BLOGS IS BASICALLY ALL THE SAME THEME OF , LIVERPOOL CITY, SO I'M JOINING THEM ALL TOGETHER.
AS OF NOW YOU CAN READ ALL THE USUAL COLLECTION OF INFORMATION IN ONE LOCATION.
LIVERPOOL IN A MESS LINK BELOW.



TORI BLARE

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

LIVERPOOL CAPITAL OF CULTURE, THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS HAVE RUINED THE HONOUR AND SKINT THE CITY WHILE THEY ARE AT IT

















AT A TIME WHEN LIVERPOOL CITY RESIDENTS SHOULD BE ABLE TO JOIN IN THE CELEBRATION OF ACHIEVING THE HONOUR OF THE CAPITAL OF CULTURE, INSTEAD OF CELEBRATING THE CITY IS HANGING ITS HEAD IN EMBARRACEMENT WITH THE BUMBLING IDIOTS THAT HAVE BEEN CHARGED WITH MAKING OUR HERITAGE ONE OF CELEBRATION.

BELOW THERE ARE REPORTS TAKEN FROM THE LOCAL PAPERS.
JOE ANDERSON HAS RESIGNED, DRUMMOND BONE TELLS US NOT TO WORRY AND THE BUMBLING IDIOT WARREN BRADLEY PUTS PRESSURE ON THE PRIVATE BUSINESS SECTOR TO PAY FOR THE FINANCIAL MESS THAT THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS CREATED.




YOU MAKE YOUR OWN OPINIONS FROM THE FACTS BELOW!






Businesses attacked over Capital of Culture

Jun 12 2007


by Jessica Shaughnessy, Liverpool Daily Post


Leader of Liverpool City Council, Cllr Warren Bradley

LIVERPOOL businesses are not doing enough to make Capital of Culture a success, city council leader Warren Bradley warned last night.

He urged the business community to help make the city ready for 2008 by putting their hands in their pockets.

But many businesses said they were reluctant to contribute to Capital of Culture coffers because they had been “left out of the loop” and were already paying enough.

Cllr Bradley said: “Everybody is going to benefit from Capital of Culture; businesses already have but many of them have not made a contribution.

“Put simply, if you want to come to the party, bring a bottle. Businesses will be happy to display the Capital of Culture logo, but they each need to play their part in making it successful.

“One example of how businesses could help is for each of them to put in £100 to pay for banners and flags, perhaps designed by local artists and students, to dress the city for Capital of Culture.”

Cllr Bradley said many businesses could feel they were on the fringe of Capital of Culture. He said: “Businesses might not feel involved in the celebrations, but they can be and should be. I would like to see every organisation in Liverpool become more proactive.

“There are 1,700 members of the Liverpool Chamber of Commerce. If they all got together to do something, the benefits would be huge, but so far they haven’t.

“It would be great to see every shop, restaurant and business flying the flag for Capital of Culture.

“There are six months left and we really need people to start thinking about what they can do. This isn’t about the city council dictating to businesses. If they got together to come up with a scheme, we would like to see how we could pay them back.”

Former Wirral MP and MEP Andrew Pearce, a member of the Liverpool Chamber of Commerce council, last night supported Cllr Bradley’s call.

He said: “The Chamber is wrong to have taken no action so far, but businesses feel detached from 2008 because they are not being engaged by the Culture Company.

“I suggested a year ago to the Chamber of Commerce that they needed to come up with some sort of scheme.

“If you go around Liverpool, there is not much to tell you that, in six months’ time, this will be the European Capital of Culture.”

Chamber vice-chairman Ed Oliver, manager of Clayton Square Shopping Centre, insisted the business community was doing its bit.

He said: “We are not prepared to fill the Culture Company’s coffers with money, but businesses in the Chamber of Commerce will be making a contribution.

“What that is, we don’t yet know. We have not had an opportunity to get together and decide how we will do it.”

Chairman of business lobbying group Downtown Liverpool in Liverpool Frank McKenna said he would be surprised if most businesses in Liverpool were not prepared to “throw £100 into a pot”.

“If the business community had felt as involved and engaged in the process as was promised, then it would be perhaps be more forthcoming in lending a helping hand.

“It should be noted that Liverpool businesses have had to endure the Big Dig at no insignificant cost to the private sector.

“Many of them are also paying increased rates as part of the Business Improvement District (BID). The idea that businesses could promote Capital of Culture was suggested two years ago when a banner was designed and showed to organisers, but they threatened to sue us.

“Cllr Bradley is suffering from the inheritance of a regime which was not quite as accessible to the business community and opportun- ities were missed.”

Liverpool Labour leader Cllr Joe Anderson criticised the idea that businesses should have to contribute.

“How dare they ask businesses for more money when they have had £90m and they squandered much of it on Robyn Archer and champagne and canapés.”

Merseyside business-man and former chairman of the Federation of Small Businesses Phil Fleming said organisations needed to take their own initiative.

He said: “You have got to be in it to win it. Businesses should be making the most of this opportunity and they are not. If they are not careful, they will miss the boat.”

MPs criticise council for failing to plan for high-cost of policing city in culture year

LIVERPOOL City Council was fiercely criticised in the Commons yesterday for failing to prepare for the high cost of policing the Capital of Culture year.

Jane Kennedy, the Wavertree MP, accused the Liberal Democrat-run council of wasting five years when it should have been building up a war chest.

The Labour backbencher was joined by Home Office minister Joan Ryan, who said: “Liverpool should have factored in the costs of security when they took the decision to bid.”

The attacks came as the Home Office again insisted there would be no extra funding to plug an estimated £10m shortfall in the 2008 policing costs.

Earlier this year, the Merseyside force said it needed funding for 200 extra officers for 2008.

The force said it could end up relying on community support officers to police the streets during 2008 – and warned local taxpayers could be hit by bigger bills.

Critics of the Home Office’s refusal to increase funding have pointed to the extra £5m handed to Manchester in 2002, when it was struggling to pay the bill for the Common-wealth Games.

Yesterday, Wirral South MP Ben Chapman condemned that refusal as “outrageous” – warning that residents elsewhere in Merseyside would suffer.

But Mrs Kennedy said: “The Lib-Dem administration of Liverpool have had five years to plan for the events of 2008 and they have singularly failed to provide the funding – taking Liverpool into debt to £20m.

“By notifying the chief constable too late to allow him to plan properly, they are left asking all taxpayers across Britain to fund Liverpool’s year of culture.”

Tomorrow, Liverpool council will debate possible options for paying for Capital of Culture events, including possibly borrowing £20m.

In reply, Ms Ryan said: “The policing costs involved are, indeed, not a sudden or unexpec-ted pressure.

“Liverpool opted to bid to be Capital of Culture, It was a voluntary decision and one would assume those responsible would do so on the basis that benefits would exceed the costs.

“They have known since 2003 that they would be the European Capital of Culture, so the police have had plenty of time to prepare and certainly that is true for the local authority.”

But Mr Chapman attacked Ms Ryan’s response as “inadequate” and pledged to continue to raise the matter.

He said: “The fact is that Liverpool is representing the whole of the UK and it is unfair that resources for neighbourhood policing should be put under severe pressure as a result.”







Labour leader quits 08 board

Jun 12 2007


by Catherine Jones, Liverpool Echo


Councillor Joe Anderson

CITY Labour chief Joe Anderson today walked away from his Capital of Culture role and accused the festival board of failing to deliver on its promises.

In a hard-hitting attack he said the Culture Board and the Culture Company were:

  • FAILING to engage communities and real people.
  • FAILING to provide a 2008 events programme that excited people.
  • FAILING to provide a worthwhile legacy for the city and missing the chance to kick-start creative industries.
  • He lashed the council for “mismanaging” the 08 funding equation and leaving Liverpool £20m short.

    Cllr Anderson vowed to fight on from his position as Opposition Group leader in an effort to ensure the city delivered the best-possible Capital of Culture.

    He said: “Wherever I go I have community groups say that they don’t feel part of Capital of Culture.

    “People are constantly complaining about over emphasis on city-centre investment and when you visit parts of Speke and see the dereliction there it really hits home.

    “I’ve been going round mounting a robust defence of Capital of Culture but my heart hasn’t been in it.”

    Cllr Anderson claimed 08 had moved away dramatically from the promises within the bid document that persuaded the Department of Culture, Media and Sport to award Liverpool the Culture accolade in 2003.

    He said: “I met the judges – Jeremy Isaacs, Tessa Sanderson – and told them all about the communities and our bid’s aspirations for them.

    “But these aspirations simply haven’t been met.”

    Cllr Anderson – born in the city centre just yards from the Paradise Street development – also refused to acknowledge that the so-called “2008 effect” had played a massive part in the city’s fast-paced economic renaissance.

    He said: “It’s a myth. The renaissance is real but it was begun by European Objective One funding and maintained by government grants.

    “Don’t forget that when the bid document was launched the Grosvenor shopping development was already in the bag as was development of the King’s Dock. Renaissance was kicking in anyway.”

    Cllr Anderson also claimed arts organisations and creative companies have been betrayed by the way 08 has been developed and have suffered from lack of involvement and no worthwhile legacy.

    He pointed to Liverpool’s literary legends Alan Bleasdale and Willy Russell as people who should have been consulted and utilised, perhaps in the creation of theatre schools to develop young talent post-2008.

    He said: “I ask myself what the legacy benefits will be and I can’t really answer that question. The Tall Ships coming back again? A bigger Mathew Street Festival?

    “There is no cultural legacy – only lack of involvement and vision.”

    It was an open secret in political circles that Cllr Anderson was struggling to reconcile his role on a cross-party and public-private sector board with his position as the city’s premier voice of opposition to the ruling Lib Dem Group which controls culture activity.

    He now believes he can work more effectively “unfettered” by collective responsibility.

    He added: “I’m now free to make whatever comments I deem constructive – sometimes positive, sometimes critical.

    “I’ve felt for months that talking to some members of the culture board is like banging your head on a brick wall.

    “Everything is met by defensiveness or accusations of negativity.”

    Cllr Anderson said he believed the culture board was guilty of building up unreasonable expectations about the festival from the word go.

    He said: “This festival will not be the wealth-creating, job-creating panacea for all the city’s ailments that it was cracked up to be.

    “There is still time to provide people with the opportunity to take part and also to give the cultural sector better opportunities to participate.

    “And if there’s one good thing to emerge from all the money that’s been spent it’s that the city has got a re-branding. It might be money well spent. We now need to have confidence in what the city has to offer.”

    Cllr Anderson said he would continue “with passion” to promote the city in a positive way.

    “This isn’t about party politics. It’s about me as a person and a Liverpudlian. And about a city with a legacy of debt.”

    Joe Anderson on .....

    ... ROBYN ARCHER

    WHEN she was brought in everybody thought WHO?

    But it was the Emperor’s New Clothes and no-one said much. Then we hardly saw her for 12 months – even though we were paying her. She then comes up with a programme and that’s when I came up with my remark that the only Aussie she hadn’t signed was Skippy the Bush Kangaroo. David Henshaw and Mike Storey brought her halfway across the world but she knew so little about Liverpool. She quits and we’re a laughing stock, giving her a huge pay-off while community groups are getting knocked back for £2,000.

    ... THE 2008 PROGRAMME

    I’M not convinced there’s really anything outstanding in there.

    There’s nothing that jumps out – no wow factor, no big theme. I’m terrified the 2008 opening ceremony is going to be all about B-list celebrities. And as for 2007 we’re already halfway through it and I don’t detect any great birthday excitement.

    ... 08 BOARD MEMBERS

    PHIL Redmond and Roger Phillips were a breath of fresh air and I wish we had a few more like them.

    They are not controversial but they speak as they see it and as people in the street see it.

    There should definitely be a broader mix of people on the board. In four-and-a-half years we haven’t achieved much.

    ... THE FUNDING DILEMMA

    THE council has failed to prepare a war chest since COC was awarded in 2004.

    The Government has supplied more than the £10m requested by the city council in the Bid Document.

    Hoping that the Government would bail out the city if it let the problem fester until the last minute was a high-risk strategy.

    The council should have been honest with the people and said “Look, this is what Cultural Year will cost and we will have to save for it between 2003 and 2008”.

    ... COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

    VISITORS might like 2008 but I don’t think residents will.

    Go to Dingle, Everton, Speke and you’ll find people who’ve come up with ideas but they are frustrated at getting neither financial nor physical support.

    It’s a failure that we haven’t encouraged them to participate.

    Police cash turned down again

    THE government has again turned down Merseyside police's bid for extra funding to provide proper protection for Capital of Culture.

    Home Office minister Joan Ryan shrugged off demands for £9m to deploy an extra 200 officers to deal with the expected influx of visitors.

    She said the city region's force, like others across England and Wales, has received extra funding since 1997 and it is "for those responsible for hosting 2008 to plan for security."

    The minister was grilled by Wirral South MP Ben Chapman who fears the refusal will lead to a policing squeeze across the region.

    He said later: "Frankly this is an inadequate response and we shall continue pressing for more resources.

    "The decision to withhold any kind of support, unlike similar major events in the past, is outrageous.

    “The fact is that Liverpool is representing the whole of the UK and it is unfair that cash for neighbourhood policing across Merseyside should be put under severe pressure as a result."

    Last month another Home Office minister, Baroness Scotland, told the Bishop of Liverpool and peers that they had no chance of winning the extra money.

    The issue is fast turning into a major political row as MPs and Lords highlighted the contrast with extra policing costs, picked up by the Treasury, incurred during last year's Labour conference in Manchester and during the 2004 Commonwealth Games in the same city.

    Earlier this year police authority chief Bill Weightman said local council taxpayers should not be penalised.

    Business urged to cough up for culture

    LIVERPOOL businesses have been accused of not doing enough to make Capital of Culture a success.

    Council leader Warren Bradley urged the business community to help make the city ready for 2008 by putting their hands in their pockets.

    But many businesses said they were reluctant to contribute to Capital of Culture coffers because they had been “left out of the loop” and were already paying enough.

    Cllr Bradley said: “Everybody is going to benefit from Capital of Culture; businesses already have but many of them have not made a contribution.

    “Put simply, if you want to come to the party, bring a bottle. Businesses each need to play their part in making Capital of Culture successful.”



    ‘Culture mess will oust the Lib-Dems’

    Jun 13 2007


    by Larry Neild


    Labour leader Joe Anderson tells City Editor Larry Neild why he quit the Capital of Culture board

    LIVERPOOL’S Labour leader, Joe Anderson, said last night his decision to resign from the company spearheading the city’s 2008 culture celebrations had been “heartbreaking”.

    But he predicted that the way the culture programme was being run would see the ruling Liberal Democrats digging their political grave.

    “I have put every one of our councillors and candidates on ‘battle’ footing to prepare to take control of the city next year when the people of the city see for themselves the mess that has been made,” he said.

    The Lib-Dems accused Cllr Anderson of using the Capital of Culture crown as a political football following his shock resignation from the Culture Company board yesterday.

    Cllr Mike Storey, executive member for regeneration, said: “At a time when we should all be flying the flag for our city, we are witnessing political opportunism of the worse kind from Joe Anderson and that saddens me.”

    In his resignation letter to Professor Drummond Bone, chairman of Liverpool Culture Company, Cllr Anderson talks about council taxpayers’ money being wasted on corporate entertainment.

    Figures gathered under the Freedom of Information Act reveal that the Liverpool Culture Company will have a wage bill this year of at least £4.2m, meaning an average salary of £42,000 a year for its 100 staff.

    Invoices seen by the Daily Post include almost £8,000 a month for consultancy fees and expenses for former bid leader Sir Bob Scott, almost £2,400 for a chauffeur-driven car for a culture company officer and almost £5,000 to a recruitment firm to find six candidates for an office manager post.

    Cllr Anderson said: “I have in my office invoices passed to me anonymously, showing Culture Company officers enjoying dinner in Liverpool’s top restaurants while we have small community groups being turned away for funding for their modest projects”.

    PROF Bone, who is also Vice Chancellor of the University of Liverpool, said exception would be taken to claims that the celebrations were elitist.

    He called for people to work together and said the board would not be deflected from its key aim of delivering an unfor- gettable programme for 2008. But dozens of messages received at the Labour office in Dale Street backed Cllr Anderson’s decision to quit the Culture Company board.

    “I heard that the city’s ruling Liberal Democrats had described my decision as a stunt, but it has been a heartbreaking decision and something I have been mulling over for some time. If it had been a stunt, I would have jumped before the May local elections,” said Cllr Anderson.

    Cllr Storey was leader of the city council when the decision was made to award Liverpool the European Capital of Culture title.

    He said: “I have had criticisms myself of the Culture Company and we resolved those within the city. I cannot imagine what Cllr Anderson hopes to achieve and in some ways I am glad he has stepped down. It is a very sad day for the Labour party.

    “I believe he has been very badly advised and I know that his decision will not deflect us from delivering a cultural year we can be proud of as a city.

    “If we want to be a premier European city, we have to act like one, and that means we don’t take our special guests down to Fred’s Café. If we host visits by presidents and mayors of major cities, it is right that we extend hospitality.

    “Our leader, Warren Bradley, is out night after night at events and functions, flying the flag for the city we all love. If Liverpool is to succeed in the future then Capital of Culture must succeed. This cheap political shot by Cllr Anderson will not work.”

    BUSINESSWEEK: PAGES 1-2, 8-9

    larryneild


    Let's all work together pleads Culture chairman

    Jun 12 2007


    by Larry Neild, Liverpool Daily Post


    Prof Drummond Bone

    THE chairman of Liverpool Culture Company this afternoon made the first official response to the resignation from of board of Labour leader Cllr Joe Anderson.

    In his response to Cllr Anderson's decision Professor Drummond Bone, who is also vice chancellor of the University of Liverpool, said partners in the city's 2008 programme will take exception to Cllr Anderson's claims that culture year events are elitist.

    Cllr Anderson said he had no intention of remaining on the sidelines and will articulate his concerns from outside the board.

    Prof Bone: "I have today accepted Joe Anderson"s resignation from the Culture Company Board with both sadness and disappointment.

    "It is a shame that discussion of different priorities will no longer happen inside the Board, particularly at a time when all-party support should be fundamental to the successful delivery of European Capital of Culture for the people of Liverpool.

    "We do a tremendous amount of work with our communities although we can never do enough - projects that are delivered hand in hand with hundreds of Liverpool cultural organisations both large and small.

    "Only last night, FACT played host to the screening of a locally-made film on the Jewish community of Liverpool, which was driven by a small grant from the Culture Company.

    "The involvement of the people of the city was crucial in the bid and remains crucial for the Board not just for next year but also as a legacy.

    "We also have to remember that Liverpool is the UK"s nomination for 2008 and must also deliver a high-quality programme for national and international audiences - I am certain that our partners in the major cultural organisations of the city will take exception to Joe"s claim that events are "elitist".

    "In fact, quite the reverse applies - the programme for 2008 is in excellent shape and reflects the lives, experiences and character of the people of Liverpool.

    "It is vital that we all work together and the Board is determined not to be deflected from its key aim of leading the delivery of an unforgettable programme for 2008."

    Top Top

    Print this article Close window





    Tuesday, May 29, 2007

    DRUMMOND BONE RESIGNS FROM LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY


    WHY CAN'T HE QUIT THE CULTURE COMPANY INSTEAD?


    DAILY POST ARTICLE IN FULL BELOW


    Drummond Bone to quit Liverpool University

    May 29 2007




    CULTURE company chairman Professor Drummond Bone will step down as Liverpool University vice chancellor halfway through the 2008 celebrations.

    Last night Prof Bone said next summer is the “right time” for him to leave the university but he will remain in his role steering the activities during Capital of Culture year.

    He said: “I will have been in this job nine years, and I am a great believer that leaders should not stay in their positions for too long.

    “The summer of 2008 will be a time of pause for the university before it begins a time of big change in 2009.

    “It is a perfect time to hand over to somebody else.”

    Prof Bone said the next 15 months will be hectic, both for the university and the city.

    He said: “I do want to see through some important commitments I have made to Liverpool, but my decision to step down has nothing to do with Capital of Culture. If by September 2008, things are not in place, then it will be too late.”

    For more on this breaking news story, read Wednesday's Liverpool Daily Post.






    Sunday, May 13, 2007

    SIGN UP TO REMOVE HENSHAW


    THESE PUBLIC SPIRITED PEOPLE HAVE SIGNED THE DOWNING STREET PETITION.

    ADD YOUR NAME TODAY ......

    http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Henshaw/


    Tony Parrish, the Petition Creator, joined by:


    * David Ingham
    * A Smith
    * Dany Pat
    * len matthews
    * Julie Poland
    * R L G Hollis
    * p. brough
    * A Kelly
    * Neil Macdonald
    * Philip David Ellwand
    * John Neill
    * C conwy
    * C Ruthin
    * Cllr Steve Radford
    * M.Murphy
    * Matt Finnegan (ex-AED)
    * Tori Blare
    * Paulette Cole
    * Liverpool Times
    * Cllr Ray Halpin
    * Colin Hilston
    * Richard Fenna
    * Angela Green
    * Jules Bennett
    * Ms Elizabeth S Pascoe
    * John McGivern
    * Jonathan Brown
    * Jim North
    * wayne Colquhoun
    * Storiblare
    * Frazer Kearney
    * Nick Wallace
    * James Collister
    * jon edwards
    * Christopher Helm
    * Sara Newton
    * S Murphy
    * Julie Finnigan

    Sunday, November 26, 2006

    LIVERPOOL EVIL CABAL UPDATE 10




    I HAVE COPIED BOTH THE ARTICLE AND THE COMMENTS FROM CITY OF THE DEAD BLOG SPOT.

    PEOPLE OF LIVERPOOL STAND UP AND DEMAND TO KNOW WHY YOU HAVE NO FACILITIES IN YOUR AREA, YET THESE BLATANT THIEVES ARE GETTING AWAY WITH IT ALL AND CAN CARRY ON STEALING YOUR MONEY!!!!!!




    THE city council's internal report into The 08 Place has given the go-ahead for private firms to lobby senior council officers about lucrative contracts.
    The report says there is "nothing wrong" in them making such contact.

    It also admits that the thieving rottweiller, McElhinney did not tell the truth to councillors about The 08 Place contract.

    But charitably, arrogantly and unbelievably naively, it concludes:
    "there is no evidence that the statement was made knowing it to be untrue and in order to mislead."

    The report, by bald legal eagle, Michael Kenworthy reluctantly admits that it was "not good practice" for Chas Cole's CMP Entertainment to instruct council contractors about fitting out the Culture one-stop shop.

    In other words, the council now believes that a private company should not give orders to council workmen about fitting out its own offices with posher lights than normal, better carpets, more expensive decorations and fitments etc, etc.

    (It's certainly immensely re-assuring that the city council have now very firmly drawn the line at that unthinkable state of affairs ever possibly happening, ed. Just who the hell is in charge of this amateur outfit?)


    Drawing himself up to his full 5 foot 8 inches, Kenworthy positively oozes smug pomposity, self-importance and arrogance as he concludes: "Any reasonably (sic) minded members of the public will accept that the matter has been dealt with properly by the Council, CMP and the Audit Commission."

    (Oh no we won't, ed)


    And anyway, quite what the findings of a council report has got to do with a private company like CMP, or why the council should now be bending over backwards to defend a private company like CMP, is beyond us. (Kenworthy has typically over-reached himself, ed)
    We are ignoring the Audit Commission completely since they were fast asleep on the job when McElhinney was ripping off the council for millions on behalf of Liverpool Direct.

    Kenworthy's report is:

    * silent on McElhinney, Halsall and Cole's close relationship

    * silent on the specific allegation about them running together in the New York marathon

    * silent on Halsall's son's band appearing at the Summer Pops and of course it is also

    * silent on the amount of free car parking and the rent free period given to CMP by McElhinney as part of the deal.

    The report is also highly selective - it:

    * fails to reveal that former council leader Mike Storey presented the report to Colin Cover Up (why? ed)
    * fails to include any evidence from the city council's surveyors 20/20 (why? ed)
    * fails to detail Henshaw's secret role in covering up the terms of the deal (why? ed) and
    * fails to provide any evidence for its glib conclusions.

    In other words it is the most servile, complicit and complacent cover-up imaginable. The cabal will be laughing like drains.
    Kenworthy is either gullible or a fool. (Probably both, ed)
    He says, for example, astonishingly:

    "Given CMP's historical (sic) connection with the city's Summer Pops (he means Chas Cole's relationship with the smiling assassin, Halsall ed) and inevitable contact with senior officers of the council (two in particular, of course, Halsall and McElhinney, ed) it should not have been surprising to anyone that the lessee (CMP) should have tried to use those contacts..."

    Really?

    Oh, that's okay then. Fair enough.
    We will keep quiet in future about private contractors trying to use their contacts with senior council officers to win a better deal. Nothing wrong with that - they should be able to wine and dine them, take them to the villa in Marbella, arrange trips to New York.

    Do they think we are all bonkers? Is Kenworthy certifiably insane?

    Kenworthy goes on to say the free parking and rent free period for The 08 Place was agreed by 20/20.
    He fails to explain why they actually gave completely different advice and, in emails, officially expressed surprise at the terms of the deal. Why?

    He admits that McElhinney gave the wrong information to the Select Committee about work on The 08 Place - but doesn't say McElhinney wrongly told councillors work had ceased and then failed to correct that information. (So that's ok then, McElhinney can lie all he likes in the future, too. Presumably he has not aplogised to councillors for misleading them either? ed)
    It also claims that McElhinney was 'very clear' that no works should continue on The 08 Place beyond the £900,000 figure approved by the council.


    So why did McElhinney fail to tell councillors that work was continuing beyond that amount?
    Kenworthy says there is no evidence that McElhinney acted inappropriately or had any pecuniary interest in the transaction. (What investigations did he conduct to examine that interest then? ed)

    Kenworthy finally asks us to rely on the assurances given by the Chief Executive(s) (the greedy blackmailer Henshaw and Colin Cover Up, ed).

    He must be joking.


    His report is based on ('trust me, I'm the very important Acting City Solicitor) mere assertion, with no evidence whatsoever adduced to support his conclusions. If he says it, it must be true.
    I don't think so, bald eagle.

    Crucially Kenworthy's report does not explain why the cost of The 08 Place soared from £900,000 to £1.4million. Half a million pounds of public money down the drain.

    Nor does it apologise for that massive increase.
    Nor does it explain what steps have been taken to prevent the same situation happening again.
    Nor does it call for the appropriate distance to be observed between council officers with control of lucrative contracts and the bosses of private firms.
    It is the most specious, superficial and condescending report produced by the city council in a long time.
    And it now proves, without any question, just who is really in charge of Liverpool city council.

    NB Contrary to the craven Echo's incorrect story last night, the report does not even deal with the allegations concerning Liverpool Direct Limited. (Spin gone into overdrive again, methinks, ed)

    Posted by Tony Parrish47 at Tuesday, November 21, 2006

    Labels: Bradley, Chas 'show me the money' Cole, Colin 'Cover up' Hilton, Henshaw, liverpoolevilcabal, MceLhinney, The Smiling Assassin

    17 comments:

    sickened said...

    well done
    Wednesday, November 22, 2006 7:39:00 AM

    Anonymous said...

    Doesn't this mean your dossier is bollocks old chap?
    You should probably scurry off back down your hole.
    Wednesday, November 22, 2006 1:00:00 PM


    Mrs Hilton said...

    Lib Dems said it as in the past and to leave it in the past, so thats ok then isnt it?
    Wednesday, November 22, 2006 3:15:00 PM

    Tony Parrish47 said...

    you wish...(to anonymous, aka the smiling assassin Halsall)
    Wednesday, November 22, 2006 6:18:00 PM


    not scared of them said...

    and anyway, wasn't it the leader of the council's dossier (which he believed so serious, he took it to the police?)?
    Wednesday, November 22, 2006 6:20:00 PM

    Shoulder to shoulder said...

    They are desperate for you to go away Tony - 'scurry off back down your hole', they beg. You have caused them so much damage and so much discomfort and exposed them for what they are. Evil, greedy, malignant tossers.
    Wednesday, November 22, 2006 6:26:00 PM

    Tori Blare said...

    NO HOLE IS BIG ENOUGH TO HIDE ALL THIS CORRUPTION!

    If Halsal was so sure of himself he would put his name on his comment.
    If you do scurry down a hole tony, then I and many many oh so many others will be down there with you.

    We won't go away until justice has been served.
    Wednesday, November 22, 2006 8:13:00 PM

    mrs doctor mc dog said...

    So that is why McElhinney needed his shower!

    he needs it for all the EVIL ones to wash away the sins of the 08 whitewash
    Wednesday, November 22, 2006 8:16:00 PM

    Tony Parrish Fan said...

    Tony(s)

    Please keep up this excellent work you have got these Cabalists under pressure and they cant hold on for ever.

    We will be free soon if you keep this up - let us know how we can support you!
    Wednesday, November 22, 2006 10:45:00 PM

    Anonymous said...

    These people make me sick to the core

    Why is everyone protecting them?jgxwm
    Thursday, November 23, 2006 1:19:00 PM

    Tony Parrish47 said...

    Fear
    Thursday, November 23, 2006 4:03:00 PM

    Truth, justice and democracy said...

    Don't be downhearted Tone, always remember how much damage you caused them, the fun we all had during the summer exposing the bastards and the fact that they will never be able to get away with their cosy little corruption again. They will always be looking over their shoulder for someone completely different to suddenly start another blog. A bit like this one. We owe you mate.
    Thursday, November 23, 2006 4:27:00 PM

    Surmounter said...

    Yes and just think how they must be petrified that one day Colin Cover up might soon take a handsome redundancy payment and get a juicy fat salary to join another New Labour quango and we the citizens might get a non coverer upper in his place who will do his or her job properly and take action against them or even that someone from outside this city starts to take this disgraceful corruption seriously.

    These cabalists must be sick to the core
    Friday, November 24, 2006 8:18:00 PM

    Anonymous said...

    so they think they know who the legendary tony parrish is!!!
    if a quarter of the time was spent properley looking into allegations made as trying to find out his identity we would perhaps find out the truth. what a whitewash
    Friday, November 24, 2006 10:38:00 PM

    Tony Parrish47 said...

    Keep on keeping on folks and fight the good fight...
    Friday, November 24, 2006 11:15:00 PM


    All Seeing Aye said...

    The council may think they have covered up their corruption but every single person in the city thinks otherwise.

    Thanks to Tony, the Truth is out!
    Saturday, November 25, 2006 4:35:00 PM

    Anonymous said...

    He looks like a wimp as well as acting like one
    Saturday, November 25, 2006 4:58:00 PM

    Wednesday, November 22, 2006

    LIVERPOOL CAPITAL OF CULTURE MY ARSE!!!!!!!!!! JUST SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!!















    FOLLOW THIS
    LINK
    TO READ ABOUT THE WASTE OF PUBLIC MONEY ONCE AGAIN BY THE LIVERPOOL EVIL CABALISTS; OR READ BELOW.



    THE city council's internal report into The 08 Place has given the go-ahead for private firms to lobby senior council officers about lucrative contracts.
    The report says there is "nothing wrong" in them making such contact.
    It also admits that the thieving rottweiller, McElhinney did not tell the truth to councillors about The 08 Place contract.


    But charitably, arrogantly and unbelievably naively, it concludes:
    "there is no evidence that the statement was made knowing it to be untrue and in order to mislead."

    The report, by bald legal eagle, Michael Kenworthy reluctantly admits that it was "not good practice" for Chas Cole's CMP Entertainment to instruct council contractors about fitting out the Culture one-stop shop.


    In other words, the council now believes that a private company should not give orders to council workmen about fitting out its own offices with posher lights than normal, better carpets, more expensive decorations and fitments etc, etc. (It's certainly immensely re-assuring that the city council have now very firmly drawn the line at that unthinkable state of affairs ever possibly happening, ed. Just who the hell is in charge of this amateur outfit?)


    Drawing himself up to his full 5 foot 8 inches, Kenworthy positively oozes smug pomposity, self-importance and arrogance as he concludes: "Any reasonably (sic) minded members of the public will accept that the matter has been dealt with properly by the Council, CMP and the Audit Commission."

    (Oh no we won't, ed)

    And anyway, quite what the findings of a council report has got to do with a private company like CMP, or why the council should now be bending over backwards to defend a private company like CMP, is beyond us. (Kenworthy has typically over-reached himself, ed)
    We are ignoring the Audit Commission completely since they were fast asleep on the job when McElhinney was ripping off the council for millions on behalf of Liverpool Direct.

    Kenworthy's report is:

    * silent on McElhinney, Halsall and Cole's close relationship

    * silent on the specific allegation about them running together in the New York marathon

    * silent on Halsall's son's band appearing at the Summer Pops and of course it is also

    * silent on the amount of free car parking and the rent free period given to CMP by McElhinney as part of the deal.

    The report is also highly selective - it:

    * fails to reveal that former council leader Mike Storey presented the report to Colin Cover Up (why? ed)

    * fails to include any evidence from the city council's surveyors 20/20 (why? ed)

    * fails to detail Henshaw's secret role in covering up the terms of the deal (why? ed) and

    * fails to provide any evidence for its glib conclusions.


    In other words it is the most servile, complicit and complacent cover-up imaginable. The cabal will be laughing like drains.
    Kenworthy is either gullible or a fool. (Probably both, ed)

    He says, for example, astonishingly:

    "Given CMP's historical (sic) connection with the city's Summer Pops (he means Chas Cole's relationship with the smiling assassin, Halsall ed) and inevitable contact with senior officers of the council (two in particular, of course, Halsall and McElhinney, ed) it should not have been surprising to anyone that the lessee (CMP) should have tried to use those contacts..."

    Really?
    Oh, that's okay then. Fair enough. We will keep quiet in future about private contractors trying to use their contacts with senior council officers to win a better deal. Nothing wrong with that - they should be able to wine and dine them, take them to the villa in Marbella, arrange trips to New York.


    Do they think we are all bonkers? Is Kenworthy certifiably insane?

    Kenworthy goes on to say the free parking and rent free period for The 08 Place was agreed by 20/20. He fails to explain why they actually gave completely different advice and, in emails, officially expressed surprise at the terms of the deal. Why?

    He admits that McElhinney gave the wrong information to the Select Committee about work on The 08 Place - but doesn't say McElhinney wrongly told councillors work had ceased and then failed to correct that information. (So that's ok then, McElhinney can lie all he likes in the future, too. Presumably he has not aplogised to councillors for misleading them either? ed)

    It also claims that McElhinney was 'very clear' that no works should continue on The 08 Place beyond the £900,000 figure approved by the council.
    So why did McElhinney fail to tell councillors that work was continuing beyond that amount?
    Kenworthy says there is no evidence that McElhinney acted inappropriately or had any pecuniary interest in the transaction. (What investigations did he conduct to examine that interest then? ed)

    Kenworthy finally asks us to rely on the assurances given by the Chief Executive(s) (the greedy blackmailer Henshaw and Colin Cover Up, ed).

    He must be joking.

    His report is based on ('trust me, I'm the very important Acting City Solicitor) mere assertion, with no evidence whatsoever adduced to support his conclusions. If he says it, it must be true.

    I don't think so, bald eagle.

    Crucially Kenworthy's report does not explain why the cost of The 08 Place soared from £900,000 to £1.4million. Half a million pounds of public money down the drain.
    Nor does it apologise for that massive increase.
    Nor does it explain what steps have been taken to prevent the same situation happening again.
    Nor does it call for the appropriate distance to be observed between council officers with control of lucrative contracts and the bosses of private firms.

    It is the most specious, superficial and condescending report produced by the city council in a long time.

    And it now proves, without any question, just who is really in charge of Liverpool city council.

    NB Contrary to the craven Echo's incorrect story last night, the report does not even deal with the allegations concerning Liverpool Direct Limited. (Spin gone into overdrive again, methinks, ed)

    Posted by Tony Parrish47 at Tuesday, November 21, 2006

    Labels: Bradley, Chas 'show me the money' Cole, Colin 'Cover up' Hilton, Henshaw, liverpoolevilcabal, MceLhinney, The Smiling Assassin

    8 comments:

    sickened said...

    well done

    Wednesday, November 22, 2006 7:39:00 AM

    Anonymous said...

    Doesn't this mean your dossier is bollocks old chap?
    You should probably scurry off back down your hole.
    Wednesday, November 22, 2006 1:00:00 PM

    Mrs Hilton said...

    Lib Dems said it as in the past and to leave it in the past, so thats ok then isnt it?
    Wednesday, November 22, 2006 3:15:00 PM

    Tony Parrish47 said...

    you wish...(to anonymous, aka the smiling assassin Halsall)
    Wednesday, November 22, 2006 6:18:00 PM

    not scared of them said...

    and anyway, wasn't it the leader of the council's dossier (which he believed so serious, he took it to the police?)?
    Wednesday, November 22, 2006 6:20:00 PM

    Shoulder to shoulder said...

    They are desperate for you to go away Tony - 'scurry off back down your hole', they beg. You have caused them so much damage and so much discomfort and exposed them for what they are. Evil, greedy, malignant tossers.
    Wednesday, November 22, 2006 6:26:00 PM

    Tori Blare said...

    NO HOLE IS BIG ENOUGH TO HIDE ALL THIS CORRUPTION!

    If Halsal was so sure of himself he would put his name on his comment.
    If you do scurry down a hole tony, then I and many many oh so many others will be down there with you.

    We won't go away until justice has been served.

    Wednesday, November 22, 2006 8:13:00 PM

    mrs doctor mc dog said...

    So that is why McElhinney needed his shower!

    he needs it for all the EVIL ones to wash away the sins of the 08 whitewash
    Wednesday, November 22, 2006 8:16:00 PM



    STAY POSTED

    Tuesday, November 14, 2006

    DAVID MC DOG IS A ROBBER














    The Liverpool Times has made comment on the BT and LDL Scandal.

    The problem with this is,
    IT IS STILL GOING ON!!!

    See below for Liverpool Times article


    The multi- million pound contract between Liverpool City Council and BT is under fresh scrutiny following criticism from Councils Auditors.

    This lucrative contract gave BT a monopoly interest in vast areas of the Council’s services. One Stop Shops, Libraries, and Registrar services to name but a few.

    BT - Cosy deals for Liverpools politicians, cosy deals for BT

    The awarding of the contact was dressed up as giving the honest Council taxpayers a better and cheaper service. In reality it has helped to make BT worth £23.2billion pounds, and paved the way for an impending big payout for it’s shareholders.

    Until new labour seized power, publicly owned assets could not make a private profit while they were still being sustained by the taxpayer. In this case the hard pressed Liverpool Council taxpayers pay for the services through their monthly Council tax payments, ( like those mentioned above) that BT deliver on behalf of the Council. Someone who has done rather nicely out of the City Council contract is the ubiquitous “Dr” David Mc Elhinney.
    When he was the Council’s deputy Chief Executive he masterminded the deal between the City Council and BT.

    He had closed a similar deal whilst working for the far right Knowsley Council.

    Shortly after the Liverpool deal was tied up “Macca” took a pay off from the City Council and walked straight into a top job with BT ! Based in Sir Thomas Street.(AND PUT IN A NICE NEW £15,000 SHOWER FOR HIMSELF AND SOME BLONDE BIT ED)

    All this may be totally above board. In local government however things are not that simple. Council’s have huge assets whose primary objectives are to benefit the people. Have any Council taxpayers been given shares by BT ? Is the Pope an atheist!

    What “Macca” has pulled off is a clear example of the type of spiv society new labour has created. Ironically when the Tories sold Council house’s labour screamed opposition from the rooftops, even though millions of their own voters gained from the sale. Similarly with the sale of the public utilities, ordinary people were allowed to purchase shares at favourable prices. In the mid 1990s many ordinary people gained financial windfalls when Building Societies converted to Banks.

    Under new labour only the privileged few make the money. As the Liverpool Council taxpayers will not benefit from the BP payout, they should be told if “Macca“and Henshaw have held any share holdings in BT or any of its Subsidiaries, in the period leading up to awarding of the contract, or during any period of time since ?

    Cllr Joe Anderson and his new labour group should take note, what has gone on has never been official labour party policy ! Go on, take on the “new labour Lib Dem’s”